Research & Evidence

What we know, and what we are measuring

Coil Position Matters: Research & Evidence

Free Clinical Reference Tool

TargetStudio™ Beam F3 Pro — 3D DLPFC, Cephalic Index & Stokes Depth Calculator

Calculate scalp coordinates for Left F3, Right F4, Bilateral DLPFC, Fz (DMPFC), FCz (pre-SMA), and M1 with Cephalic Index (Dolicho/Meso/Brachycephalic) skull morphology adjustment, P5–P95 Head Size Percentiles, Stokes et al. (2007) Cortical Depth Intensity Correction, interactive 3D WebGL view, and PDF protocol sheet export.

1. Why Coil Position Matters. Where the TMS coil sits matters. Scalp-based rules such as standard Beam F3 position the coil from basic tape measurements and cannot fully account for individual cranial anatomy. MRI-guided optical neuronavigation is more precise, but many clinics do not have it on site, and it adds registration time to every session.

2. Cranial Morphology & Cephalic Index (Mir-Moghtadaei et al., 2015; Li et al., 2025). Standard scalp heuristics approximate the cranium as a sphere, which introduces systematic localization error on elongated dolichocephalic (CI < 75) or wide brachycephalic (CI > 80) skulls:
CI = (Cranial Biparietal Width / Cranial Anteroposterior Length) × 100
Our free TargetStudio™ Beam F3 Pro Calculator provides anthropometric Cephalic Index compensation and normative P5–P95 head percentiles, while our 3D-printed interfaces register directly to the individual's 3D head surface.

3. Stokes Cortical Depth Intensity Adjustment (Stokes et al., 2007). When the prefrontal target (DLPFC) lies deeper from the scalp than the primary motor cortex hand knob (M1), nominal RMT stimulation can under-dose the target cortex. Scaling stimulator output by scalp-to-cortex distance differential accounts for depth-dependent field decay:
Target Intensity = RMT × [ 1 + 0.027 × (Distance_DLPFC − Distance_M1) ]

4. 3D-Printed Headsets & Ongoing Validation (Mansouri et al., 2018; Patent AT 527771). Patient-specific, 3D-printed headsets were proposed and validated in a 2018 study by Mansouri et al. (Journal of Neural Engineering, doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aacb96) as a practical way to reproduce a planned coil pose without daily camera tracking. Brainautics is preparing a formal validation study measuring how precisely its patented interfaces (AT 527771) reproduce coil position across repeated placement compared with optical neuronavigation (with a 0.5 mm mechanical design target). We will publish the measured results on this page; until then, we make no clinical accuracy or treatment outcome claims. Brainautics interfaces are supplied for research use and are not CE-marked or FDA-cleared.

What researchers told us

Quoted from written correspondence with researchers who reviewed our approach. Names are withheld.

Professor, neurostimulation research group
European university

We definitely see the value of your approach for cases where no neuronavigation system exists in par...

Retired professor of psychiatry
Autism and TMS research, USA

Definitely, such a device would have a lot of merit. It would help overcome some of the major diffic...

TargetStudio™ Beam F3 Pro — Free 3D Calculator

Our interactive 3D WebGL clinical calculator computes exact 10-20 coordinates for F3, F4, Bilateral DLPFC, Fz (DMPFC), FCz (pre-SMA), and M1 with automated Cephalic Index (Dolicho/Brachycephalic) compensation, P5–P95 head percentiles, Stokes depth formula, and 1-click PDF protocol export.

Learn more Beam W et al. (2009) Brain Stimul 2(1):50-54; Mir-Moghtadaei A et al. (2015) Brain Stimul 8(5):965-973; Stokes MG et al. (2007) J Neurosci 27(19):5241-5247.
TargetStudio™ Beam F3 Pro — Free 3D Calculator

How Accurate is Standard Beam F3? Skull Shape Matters

In MRI-based head models of 114 individuals, standard Beam F3 accuracy degraded significantly with variations in cranial morphology, and non-spherical dolichocephalic/brachycephalic skulls induce up to 14–18 mm of DLPFC discrepancy unless anatomically compensated.

Learn more Li Z, Sack AT, Duecker F. Finding F3: A comparative analysis of scalp-based methods for TMS coil positioning. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. 2025;2:100083. doi: 10.1016/j.transm.2024.100083.
How Accurate is Standard Beam F3? Skull Shape Matters

Stokes Cortical Depth Intensity Correction

When the prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) lies deeper from the scalp than the motor hand knob (M1), nominal RMT stimulation becomes subthreshold. Correcting intensity via Target = RMT × [1 + 0.027 × (D_DLPFC − D_M1)] restores effective cortical electric-field dosing.

Learn more Stokes MG, Chambers CD, Gould IC, English T, McNaught E, McDonald O, Mattingley JB. Simple metric for estimating TMS dose based on scalp-to-cortex distance. J Neurosci. 2007;27(19):5241-5247.
Stokes Cortical Depth Intensity Correction

Granted Austrian Patent AT 527771 & PCT Family

Brainautics holds granted Austrian Patent AT 527771 B1 and international PCT/EPO applications (EP4461334A1) covering patient-specific 3D stereotaxic coil interfaces, multi-lip coil seating, and vacuum-assisted scalp stabilization.

Learn more Grygorian A. Device for positioning a transcranial stimulation coil on a patient's head. Austrian Patent AT 527771 B1; European Patent Application EP4461334A1.
Granted Austrian Patent AT 527771 & PCT Family

3D-Printed Neuronavigation Headsets & Multi-Session TMS

Peer-reviewed validation demonstrates that patient-specific 3D-printed headsets reproduce the planned coil position consistently across sessions without requiring daily optical camera setup.

Learn more Mansouri F, Mir-Moghtadaei A, et al. Development and validation of a 3D-printed neuronavigation headset for therapeutic brain stimulation. J Neural Eng. 2018;15(4):046034.
3D-Printed Neuronavigation Headsets & Multi-Session TMS